2010
02.15

In these tough times, with so many people struggling, I don’t see the iPad or any other new gadget doing very well. 2010 will be a year to hope things turn around and what this means is more sluggish economy and more people cutting back on their luxuries, such as the new phone you’ve been wanting to get, or that new laptop. So with this being the case, you can surely bet that Apple will drop the price of the iPad as soon as it doesn’t sell, which I bet it won’t. This article below is from Business Week and breaks down the actual cost of the iPad, showing that there’s plenty of room to lower the price. Just wait it out everyone and you’ll save yourself a bunch of doe, cashola, mulla, greenbacks..

Apple’s (AAPL) iPad tablet computer, introduced Jan. 27, may have component costs of as little as $219.35, according to a preliminary estimate by market research firm iSuppli.

Materials for the iPad, due to go on sale in March and April, include a multitouch-screen display that may cost about $80 and a $17 processor designed by Apple and manufactured by Samsung, according to El Segundo (Calif.)-based iSuppli.

Even the lowest-priced iPad, with 16 gigabytes of memory and a retail price of $499, may be beyond the reach of some budget-conscious consumers, some analysts have said. The relatively low price of the iPad’s materials gives Apple scope to reduce the retail price over time, iSuppli analyst Francis Sideco says.

“There’s certainly a decent amount of headroom in there,” Sideco says. “If they had to reduce the retail price, they certainly could.”

Price Cut Speculation

Credit Suisse (CS) analyst Bill Shope fueled speculation over price cuts when he released a research note Feb. 8 saying Apple may be flexible on pricing if the iPad doesn’t attract as many buyers as hoped. “While it remains to be seen how much traction the iPad gets initially, management noted that it will remain nimble,” Shope wrote in the note, citing recent meetings with Apple executives.

The cheapest model lacks features some consumers may want in a tablet computer and therefore may not be the most attractive option, says Roger Kay, an industry analyst and president of Endpoint Technologies Associates. “They wanted to be able to say the price is $499 and I think they shaved everything off to get there,” Kay says. “You can make the argument that the $499 model appeals only in the most limited range of use scenarios. If you want to put anything significant on it or take it anywhere, you need the more expensive models.”

Colin Smith, a spokesman for Cupertino (Calif.)-based Apple, declined to comment on iSuppli’s research as well as the prospect of price cuts for the iPad.

Research firms including iSuppli conduct so-called teardown analysis of consumer electronics to determine component prices and makers and estimate margins. Researchers at iSuppli didn’t have an actual iPad and instead relied on Apple’s public statements on its features. The analysis includes material costs, though not other expenses incurred by Apple, such as marketing.

The iPad’s most expensive component will be its 9.7-inch multitouch display, similar to the one found on the iPhone but more than twice its size. At $80, the display will cost Apple about five times the cost of the display used on the iPhone 3GS. South Korea-based LG Electronics (066570:KS) is the most likely supplier of the display, Sideco says. Apple hasn’t disclosed the identity of the maker, and LG spokesman John Taylor didn’t immediately return a call seeking comment.

A4 Chip Manufacturing

The chip running the iPad is called the A4, the fruit of Apple’s 2008 acquisition of PA Semi for $278 million.

Samsung (005930:KS) has supplied the main applications chip used in the iPhone 3GS and two previous iPhone models. In the case of the iPad, Samsung is playing a role akin to a chip foundry, building the chip under contract based on Apple’s design, Sideco says.

Chip foundry companies including Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) and United Microelectronics (UMC), both of Taiwan, similarly manufacture chips for so-called fabless chip companies that don’t have the means to build their own semiconductor factories. Sideco estimates the A4 will cost Apple about $17, only about $2 more than the Samsung chip used in the iPhone 3GS, which cost $14.46.

Of the six iPad models Apple plans to release in March and April, three will have access to 3G wireless data networks and three will work only with Wi-Fi, each with 16, 32, or 64 gigabytes of memory. The memory chips are the key variable cost across all six models, Sideco says. The price of 16 gigabytes of flash memory is $29.50 while 32 gigabytes cost $59 and 64 gigabytes cost $118.

The most profitable of the six iPads is the 32-gigabyte version with 3G network access, Sideco says. Its combined materials and manufacturing cost of $287.15 amount to 39.4% of the retail price. The least profitable is the 16-gigabyte non-3G version, which sells for $499. Its combined costs amount to $229.35 or 46% of the retail price, leaving the slimmest potential profit margin of the six.

Hesseldahl is a reporter for Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

2010
02.10

This is an interesting new social media tool by Google. Google launched a new social media tool called Buzz and what’s cool is it sits inside your Gmail, right under your inbox. If you’re familiar with Facebook posts, which you probably are. Then you’ll like Buzz, because it combines what’s best about both into one Tool and it even links to Twitter as well. You have to have a Gmail account and I think you also need to have a Google Profile. I captured the image below from the start up page in gmail.

google-buzz-launch-imageIf you don’t have a Google Gmail account, you can get one here. Gmail blows away any other e-mail service out there, yes even Yahoo. There’s an old saying that we live by in my Industry and it applies here as well. It goes “Good Artists Copy, but Great Artists Steal.” - Pablo Picasso Google has definitely stolen the successful works of Facebook and Twitter, but has done so in a very smart way, by combining it with their very popular Gmail.

I like they took the @mentions from Twitter, so if you mention one of your friends in a Buzz post, it will notify them and they can read and comment back.

The Mobile version is nice as well and you don’t need to download an app if you own an iPhone. All you have to do it go to the webpage in your mobile Safari and you’re good to go. The address on your mobile phone is buzz.google.com

I’ve embedded their video below, watch, buzz and enjoy.

Please feel free to comment on what you think and if this will be a game changer or fizzle out like Wave. I’m interested in hearing what everyone thinks.

2010
02.04

FreelanceSwitch.com has something cool if you’re a freelance graphic designer or web developer, but then again I guess it could be good for a lot of things. I’ll let them explain it best, here’s content I copied from their site for you.
————

Hello! We hope you find this calculator useful. Mail us if you have a suggestion or question. And don’t forget to visit FreelanceSwitch

What is This?
We have developed this hourly rate calculator to give you a guide based on your costs, number of billable hours and desired profit. It is a simple tool for you to play with.
Remember your hourly rate should always take into account factors like market demand, industry standards, skill level and experience - things that unfortunately we can’t put into a calculator!
Use these calculations as a guide and then modify to suit your circumstance and conditions.
It will take you about 5-20 minutes to complete depending on how much attention you give each calculation.


2010
02.03
This is a Cool blog post I found and thought some of my followers would be interested in reading about. Katie writes about Google’s Power Meter, which I bet a lot of you didn’t even know about. Check out the post below and feel free to comment what you think.
Posted February 3rd, 2010 at 4:57 pm in Green IT

It’s still early days for Google’s web-based energy tool PowerMeter. A company spokesperson told us today that Google has “a few thousand users at this point” for PowerMeter. That’s pretty small, but it’s enough to enable Google to start using the collective energy consumption data to make recommendations for how its users can reduce their energy use (see their blog post this week).

It’s been about a year since Google announced the tool, but the search engine giant only started working with its first utility partners later on in 2009. Its first gadget partners didn’t come until October 2009 and those firms are mostly startups with small distribution capacities.

Still I would have expected a bigger userbase by now. PowerMeter has close to a dozen utility partners it’s working with that have millions of customers collectively. The high-profile media attention alone I would have thought would have converted users to a free service.

I would speculate that a barrier for more rapid adoption has been utility customer awareness of the tool. Even if Google has these utility partnerships in place it’s probably up to the utility to make consumers aware of PowerMeter’s availability. But think about it from the utility perspective — many want to own the customer relationship as much as possible, so they don’t have much of an incentive to provide much marketing for the tool.

It can also cost utilities money (in terms of employee/contractor time) to develop feeds of customer usage info for PowerMeter and also to communicate to customers about the program. Pike research predicted it cost “tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars and many months,” to implement the tool. Pike suggests to utilities: “make sure they have the means to measure the impact of the chosen program and to gather information that can be applied in other consumer-focused programs in which they may choose to invest.”

Small numbers isn’t necessarily a big problem for Google’s PowerMeter, as the tool was created as a project and never was meant to have a business model. Some of Google’s other products like Google Voice have only just broke a million users. But I think it’s telling that running the service off the back of utilities seems to be particularly difficult.